First Name
JT
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
15
Reaction score
13
Location
Canton, MI
Vehicle(s)
2015 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon
Admin update 12/10/24:

19 gallons / 71.9 liters is the official fuel capacity / gas tank size of the 2025+ 4Runner 6th Gen.
I'd have loved 20+, this really isn't too bad from my perspective.

We routinely take our built JK (12.5 mpg/avg) well into the back country in the western US. With a 20 gal tank, 12.5 miles, it's a theoretical range of 250 miles. Even sticking to a 80% capacity limit (keep a reserve), that's still an effective 200 mile range. We carry gas but, while we got uncomfortably low once or twice over the years, we've never had to use it. We simply top off almost every time we come into a small town.

With 19 gal and 22 mpg, that's a theoretical range of 418 miles. Knock that down to 17 mpg because of larger tires what-have-you, that's 323 miles. If we again use our 80% target for planning purposes, that's still 258 miles. If you carry 3-4 gallons w/you as well, you've got plenty for the vast majority of needs. Unless you're, like, going to the Artic Circle :).

For me, it comfortably represents a 29% increase in range for our overlanding purposes.
 

t4r

New member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Apr 14, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Location
Philadelphia, PA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep Wrangler
Regular from the spec sheet released the other day:


1734015288048-yv.jpg
Well WTH.
So the Land Cruiser gets 326hp and 465lb-ft on Premium fuel and the 4-Runner gets the same on Regular???? !!!
I’m guessing the engines aren’t tuned any different. Something is missing here.
 

Mrknowitall

Active member
Joined
Jul 26, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
32
Reaction score
28
Location
SE MI
Well WTH.
So the Land Cruiser gets 326hp and 465lb-ft on Premium fuel and the 4-Runner gets the same on Regular???? !!!
I’m guessing the engines aren’t tuned any different. Something is missing here.
I think it goes back to the LC being a "premium" product, and there may be some NVH targets that it won't meet on 87Reg.
 

tomter

Member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Nov 24, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
Location
Menomonee Falls, WI
Vehicle(s)
2007 4Runner SR5 4x4
I think it goes back to the LC being a "premium" product, and there may be some NVH targets that it won't meet on 87Reg.
I read from someone else that the need for premium could be because the LC is a heavier vehicle. You can run regular in those engines, but you wouldn't get the performance. The big difference to me is that all of the new 4runners incl hybrid engines will have the 19 gal tanks where the LC's only have 17.9. I have a feeling a future LC refresh will have a larger tank.
 
 
Top