- Thread starter
- #1
2025 4Runner vs. Land Cruiser offroad comparison at Moab! - Text Summary + Video
WATCH THE VIDEO:
Off-Road Challenge:
Mission is to find out which one performs better off-road in Moab's challenging terrain.
Off-Road Technologies and Features:
The Land Cruiser and 4Runner are both equipped with off-road essentials, but their approaches differ. The Land Cruiser features a full-time 4WD system with a locking center differential and sway bar disconnect, providing better ride comfort and articulation. The 4Runner, lighter and more nimble, comes with part-time 4WD, multi-terrain select (MTS), and a locking rear differential. Both vehicles feature advanced off-road modes to tackle various terrains.
Obstacle Breakdown:
Several obstacles in Moab test the approach and departure angles, ground clearance, and traction of each vehicle:- Chin Scratcher: Tests the vehicle's approach and departure angles.
- Frame Bender: A steep descent that challenges traction control.
- One Tree Hill: A steep climb where traction and wheel articulation are critical.
- The Wall: The ultimate test, combining steep inclines and declines, approach angles, and undercarriage protection.
Tires and Ground Clearance Analysis:
Both vehicles use tires sized at 265/70R18 but differ in performance due to tire brands and designs. The 4Runner has Falcon tires, while the Land Cruiser uses Michelins. The Land Cruiser’s ground clearance is quoted at about 8 inches, which helps with articulation and protection, though actual measurements can vary based on terrain.
Performance on Moab's Trails:- The Land Cruiser, with its hybrid engine, delivers 326 horsepower and 465 lb-ft of torque, making it powerful and smooth on trails. Its disconnectable sway bar enhances articulation and comfort.
- The 4Runner, although lacking a hybrid system, provides 278 horsepower and 317 lb-ft of torque, with impressive low-end torque delivery, making it a contender despite its smaller engine.
- The 4Runner’s lightweight design gives it an edge in terms of nimbleness, particularly on technical climbs. Its slightly shorter wheelbase improves maneuverability, especially on narrow trails.
- 🛻 Challenges and Damage Assessment:
- On the “Chin Scratcher” obstacle, both vehicles struggled with their approach and departure angles. The Land Cruiser experienced damage to its rear components, while the 4Runner showed better results due to its higher departure angle.
- On the “Wall,” the Land Cruiser’s additional weight led to minor undercarriage damage, while the 4Runner had an easier climb but sacrificed a side step due to limited rocker protection.
Driver Impressions:
The Land Cruiser offers better visibility and seating position due to its upright design, while the 4Runner provides a sportier and more agile feel. The Land Cruiser is praised for its smooth ride, thanks to the sway bar disconnect, while the 4Runner’s precise steering and predictable handling win praise on technical terrain.
Final Takeaways and Recommendations:
Both vehicles excel off-road, but TFL leans toward the 4Runner due to its affordability, simplicity, and performance in real-world trail conditions. They recommend the 4Runner TRD Off-Road trim without the premium package for budget-conscious off-road enthusiasts and suggest a base Land Cruiser for those willing to upgrade tires and accessories.
Conclusion: while the Land Cruiser offers advanced off-road tech and comfort, the 4Runner’s lighter weight and agility make it a favorite for serious off-roading adventures. Both vehicles remain capable but cater to slightly different off-road needs.
WATCH THE VIDEO:
And agree it looks better than the Land Cruiser when wheeling side by side, especially after the TFL guys removed the front air dam from their 4Runner.
