- Thread starter
- #1
TFL's 2025 4Runner TRD Off-Road 6th gen towing test vs. Land Cruiser. Tow Haul Mode was used and the 4Runner towed better than the LC!
TLDW text summary:
Summary
TLDW text summary:
Summary
Introduction of the All-New 2025 Toyota 4Runner
The video showcases the improved towing capacity of up to 6,000 lbs, tested on the challenging Ike Gauntlet towing route.- đź›» Initial Setup and Towing Conditions
The towing test involves a 5,500 lb trailer, featuring a Honda Acti K truck, with a Big Tex steel car hauler. The team compares the 4Runner’s performance with the new Toyota Land Cruiser. Brake Application Analysis
The team observes eight official brake applications, significantly fewer than the Land Cruiser's 12. Fewer applications indicate better control and reduced brake overheating.Performance Stability on Steep Grades
Despite the shorter wheelbase, the 4Runner maintains impressive stability with minimal trailer sway, thanks to its full-time 4WD.Engine and Transmission Overview
Equipped with a 2.4L turbocharged 4-cylinder engine generating 278 HP and 317 lb-ft torque, paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission, the 4Runner proves reliable for steep hill climbs.Efficient Uphill Performance
Accelerates smoothly with minimal strain while towing the maximum weight. The climb to 11,158 ft was completed in 7:53 minutes—better than the Land Cruiser.Vehicle Adjustments for Towing
The team highlights Toyota’s recommendation for using a weight-distribution hitch for enhanced stability, though they tested without one to gauge performance.Comparative Insights on Pricing and Features
The 4Runner’s model is priced around $58,000, comparable to the Land Cruiser. However, differences in features, such as trailer brake controllers, affect practicality.Driver Feedback and Interior Features
Mirrors and instrument layouts are sufficient for this towing test but lack detailed numerical readouts. The cabin remained quiet at around 60 dB.Surprising Overall Results
The 2025 4Runner surpassed the Land Cruiser in brake performance and achieved similar uphill efficiency, proving that it can effectively tow heavy loads when needed.
8 Brake Applications vs. 12: The 4Runner required 8 brake applications compared to the Land Cruiser’s 12 during the downhill test, highlighting its improved braking efficiency and control.
7:53 vs. 8:13 Uphill Timing: The 4Runner’s 7-minute 53-second uphill climb outperformed the Land Cruiser's 8:13, demonstrating its efficient power and torque balance despite lower output.
Last edited by a moderator: