2.4 Turbo Dislike and Criticism?

AlanA

Member
First Name
Alan A
Joined
Nov 26, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Roseville, CA
Vehicle(s)
2005 Tacoma
Why is the 2.4 Turbo-Four engine on the new LC250 and 2025 4runner getting so much dislike and criticism?
 

imac90

New member
First Name
Ian
Joined
Nov 20, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
2
Reaction score
8
Location
Pascalsiakam1$
Vehicle(s)
4Runner
Why is the 2.4 Turbo-Four engine on the new LC250 and 2025 4runner getting so much dislike and criticism?
Mostly from people who own 5th gen and are jealous of 50 extra horse power, way more torque and improved tech. There has been shots taken at the new design as well but were they supposed to just keep the vehicle looking the same for another 15 years. There isn’t really any drawbacks unless you arbitrarily consider Toyota to not make reliable vehicles anymore. Bit of a stretch if you ask me. The motor has been used in a Lexus vehicle since 2021.
 

darinja

Member
First Name
Darin
Joined
Nov 22, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
21
Reaction score
18
Location
Nashville, TN
Vehicle(s)
2023 Honda Pilot Trailsport
Why is the 2.4 Turbo-Four engine on the new LC250 and 2025 4runner getting so much dislike and criticism?
I think it's just the idea that "bigger is better." My first 4Runner was a 2007 and I got the V6. It took 230k miles before I had my first issue with the engine, and even then it was a minor one. I towed with it quite a bit and never felt like it didn't have enough power. But a LOT of owners say that only the V8 would do, and the V6 isn't good enough, or powerful enough, or reliable enough, etc. Now you get people that swore on the V8 as well as the V6 with the only option being a four-cylinder, so there's going to be speculation as well as hate.

All of that being said, people swear by the V8, and then the V6, because they've seen them last hundreds of thousands of miles and know how great they are, so having something new and unproven, it does bring a bit of nervousness.
 

Positronic

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
22
Reaction score
32
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
prior 1st gen 4Runner Turbo
yeah, could just be comfort levels for those older, more proven, and legacy engines. Some folk are hard set on the concept that a turbo introduces more components that can fail as well which further backs the more simple configurations. Personally, i've been driving subaru's for the better part of the last 20+ years and my current STi is 13 years old with 100K+ on the clock and i have had zero engine or drivetrain issues with them. Could be a testament to subaru but in my opinion a well built turbo motor is just as reliable as a NA motor. I prefer forced induction as i live at altitude in CO and compared to the LT1/LS1's and other larger displacement NA motors i've had the turbo is always a better experience for power output in the higher elevations.
 
OP
OP

AlanA

Member
First Name
Alan A
Joined
Nov 26, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Roseville, CA
Vehicle(s)
2005 Tacoma
You gave me more confidence about the 2.4 turbo engine. Will the non hybrid version be more reliable?
 
OP
OP

AlanA

Member
First Name
Alan A
Joined
Nov 26, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Roseville, CA
Vehicle(s)
2005 Tacoma
You gave me more confidence about the 2.4 turbo engine. Will the non hybrid version be more reliable?
You gave me more confidence about the 2.4 turbo engine. Will the non hybrid version be more reliable?
 

Positronic

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
22
Reaction score
32
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
prior 1st gen 4Runner Turbo
You gave me more confidence about the 2.4 turbo engine. Will the non hybrid version be more reliable?
Good question there, i think only time will tell on that one as i've never owned a hybrid or EV so don't have a ton of experience on it. One thing i'll add to my previous post is that Toyota has been in the turbo game for a long time (reference my 1st gen TURBO 4-runner in my profile pic :) straight outta the 80's) so forced induction is not new to them. I trust they will have integrated the battery with longevity and reliability in mind given their track record, so much so that i've had a deposit on an i-forcemax trim since April. I do expect some bugs and typical "first run" quirks to pop up but i hope most of the impactful ones have already been worked out via the LCs/Tacomas on the road today and the fixes already integrated into the production for the 4Runner 🤔
 
OP
OP

AlanA

Member
First Name
Alan A
Joined
Nov 26, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Roseville, CA
Vehicle(s)
2005 Tacoma
Good question there, i think only time will tell on that one as i've never owned a hybrid or EV so don't have a ton of experience on it. One thing i'll add to my previous post is that Toyota has been in the turbo game for a long time (reference my 1st gen TURBO 4-runner in my profile pic :) straight outta the 80's) so forced induction is not new to them. I trust they will have integrated the battery with longevity and reliability in mind given their track record, so much so that i've had a deposit on an i-forcemax trim since April. I do expect some bugs and typical "first run" quirks to pop up but i hope most of the impactful ones have already been worked out via the LCs/Tacomas on the road today and the fixes already integrated into the production for the 4Runner 🤔
I would think the non-hybrid turbo 4 will be more reliable, as it does not have as much components as the hybrid version.

Do you have an instagram?
 

spelingbeachampeun

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
2
Reaction score
17
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2020 Navigator, 2014 MDX, 1993 Taurus SHO
You gave me more confidence about the 2.4 turbo engine. Will the non hybrid version be more reliable?
I would assume that fewer components would mean better reliability, just because there are fewer things that can fail. But Toyota has a ton of experience with hybrids, more than any other automaker probably, so I’m personally not looking at the hybrid as a reliability concern. But I do know that that’s one more thing that could fail, as with any more complex additions to any vehicle. Also, as others have said, this isn’t the first vehicle this powertrain is in. I wouldn’t expect it to be 100% free of bugs, but I trust Toyota to stand by their vehicles as they’ve proven to in the past. Plus, it’s being built in a plant with high quality standards, so there’s that too.
 
OP
OP

AlanA

Member
First Name
Alan A
Joined
Nov 26, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Roseville, CA
Vehicle(s)
2005 Tacoma
Also, will it be required to idle the turbo four engine on the 25 4runner after a long drive or after extreme driving, especially during hot weather?
 

Positronic

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
22
Reaction score
32
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
prior 1st gen 4Runner Turbo
Also, will it be required to idle the turbo four engine on the 25 4runner after a long drive or after extreme driving, especially during hot weather?
would not say thats a hard requirement at all, most modern FI engines have pretty optimized cooling systems. Probably doesnt hurt if you've really been pushing it to let it idle a few before shutting it down but it really depends on how you define extreme driving. I'd probably only look to do that if i've been towing for an extended period of time uphill or other activities that i know has really allowed the drivetrain to heat soak.

Something like the conditions these two guys put an iforcemax through in their towing test/temp video:

 
 
Top