Sponsored

Lexus GX550 Overtrail+ decision vs the 2025 4Runner TRD Pro

EchoRunner

SR5
New member
Joined
Feb 2, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
4
Reaction score
5
Location
Midwest
Vehicle(s)
2011 Toyota 4Runner
In a stroke of good fortune, I had a rare opportunity yesterday to test drive BOTH the GX 550 OT+ and the new 4Runner ORP -- within a few hours of each other. Still digesting all of my impressions on the 4Runner. But what I can say is this:

- They are not really comparable. The Lexus is a far more refined vehicle (as you would expect I suppose, for ~50% more money!). The Lexus is superior, no question about it.

- The 4Runner rides much more smoothly than my current 2011 4Runner. Feels more composed on the highway and has more "get up and go" than my current 4Runner.

- That said, the 4 cylinder engine leaves me uneasy. It will sound like I'm contradicting myself, but -- despite the fact that it is quicker than my current 4Runner, that engine reminds you its a 4 cylinder when the stoplight goes green. Its not a lack of power, its just the way it delivers the power that just **feels** different.

- The 4Runner has added a lot of very nice comforts. I was surprised to see heated and ventilated front seats. I was surprised by the power tilt/telescope steering wheel. But it does so in a plastic-y kind of a way. I guess this is part of the 4Runner's charm, but when I'm thinking about a new vehicle in my advancing years, maybe its just not me anymore.

- Visibility in the OT+ was superior to the 4Runner. In particular, the 4Runner, with its muscular looking hood (which I personally like) and swept back windshield seems to have a pretty narrow (top to bottom) windshield that left me wondering if it would affect my enjoyment of getting out and going adventuring with it. Really cuts down on what you can see out the front.

- Dealers told me 3-6 months for an OT+ and 6+ months for a 4Runner (which didn't quite calculate, as the 4Runner I drove was readily available).

Let's put it this way. I've owned my 4Runner for 14 years. Still love it. When I got out of the 2025 4Runner ORP and into mine, it felt about the same to me, other than the far more modernized electronics in the 2025 compared to the 2011 (which is really circa 2006). But the weird thing for me was --- despite my current 4Runner being slower "off the line" and a little more lethargic than the 2025 --- I prefer the way my current V6 engine feels and sounds vs the brand new 4Runner.

So in summary, I would say my overall assessment/opinion is:

(1) the GX550 OT+ and the 4Runner ORP are targeted at different buyers and different usage patterns / user types -- and it shows.

(2) the GX 550 OT+ has smooth and abundant power delivery; the 4Runner delivers some punch, but does not feel "powerful" in doing so and you can hear the 4 cyl complain a bit from time to time.

(3) I left the GX 550 OT+ feeling confident that it was a step up (ok, maybe 2 or 3) from my current 4Runner. I left the new 4Runner not as convinced that it is a significant step up from what I have today.

(4) If my current 4Runner was worn out and I just needed to replace it --- I'm sure I would very seriously consider the 4Runner. In fact, maybe I'd go for it. But that's not my situation. I have a lot of life left in my 2011 (about 126,000 miles and maintained impeccably). It did leave me wondering "why am I getting a new vehicle," and it would be a tougher question to answer with the new 4Runner.

(5) All things considered, and despite some drawbacks, I actually prefer my current engine to the new 4 cyl. That is a really tough one to get my head around. I hope the 4 cyl works out, but as a "buy and hold" person, it scares me.

Interested in whether anyone else has had a similar opportunity to do a "virtual" side by side, or just views on my impressions on the 4Runner 6th Gen compared to 5th Gen. I'm pretty sure I will be moving in the direction of the Lexus, but again, my overall view is these 2 are not really direct compares. They are going after different buyers. And the OT+ is almost 50% more expensive. The TRD Pro starts to get you in the zip code in terms of price at $70K, but even then the OT+ is still 20-25% more. Kind of felt like comparing a $500K house to an $800K house.
 
Last edited:

MJE

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 31, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
78
Reaction score
56
Location
Calgary, AB
Vehicle(s)
2022 Ford Bronco Sport
I havenā€™t had the opportunity to experience a GX yet. The closest I came to your B2B was sitting in a LC in the showroom, then driving the lotā€˜s loaner Taco to experience the platform. From my initial impressions however Iā€™d agree with your take on things. Though the platform is the same, the LC is designed to occupy a higher price point & I can only imagine the GX builds on that. So far Iā€™m leaning LC for the increased visibility you mentioned which I can see too and because if I spend this much I expect just a little more out of a car.

Which is what has me comparing 4R & LC to begin with vs. just automatically going to a Ranger. Toyota really does seem to give you good value no matter what your budget is in a vehicle. Trying the 2.3 4 & 2.7 6 in the Ranger I can see the appeal of the 6. The 4 is adequate, the 6 is better with no real penalty. So Iā€™ve experienced only the non-hybrid 4 so far in Toyota land, but based on Fords your assessment of the 6 vs 4 in the 4R would be accurate. Iā€™m curious to try the hybrid powertrain to see if it fulfills the promise of 4 economy & 6 feel.
2025 Toyota 4runner Lexus GX550 Overtrail+ decision vs the 2025 4Runner TRD Pro IMG_0132

2025 Toyota 4runner Lexus GX550 Overtrail+ decision vs the 2025 4Runner TRD Pro IMG_0133
 

4Runner4Fun

SR5
New member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2018 Toyota Highlander, previously 2002 4Runner
Thanks for the post. I am in a similar situation. Had a 2002 4runner for 21 years and loved it despite its shortcomings. I test drove two Tacomas (regular engine sport and hybrid off-road) and a 1958 Land Cruiser today to get a feel relevant to the 6th generation 4runner that I'm really interested in. They all drove fine but I felt a lot like I was driving my old 3rd gen 4runner, although with more power and updated tech. It also feels a lot bigger. When I rented a 5th gen a few years ago I had the same impression. I guess I was thinking it would be a bigger difference after a quarter century since my last 4runner (and 15 years since gen 5). Again, not a negative but also nothing that was a positive wow for me either.

I want to find a gx 550 to test drive since I'm mentally between the 550 overtrail and 4runner TRD Pro based on reviews and what I think I'd like to splurge on but getting those vehicles to test drive is nearly impossible. As of now I'm thinking the TRD Pro as more of a fun toy but less "nice" and the 550 as an upgraded vehicle with still plenty of off-road capability but not as much of a fun factor for me. On the other hand, the 550 V6 might be plenty fun vs the I4 hybrid for driving and a pleasant cockpit for daily driving sounds nice. What isn't nice is 16mpg with premium fuel which is worse than my quarter century old 4runner. Part of my says to just keep driving my 2018 v6 Highlander from my wife out of frustration with my current lack of clarity on an expensive nice-to-have purchase. The Highlander is quite a nice vehicle but somehow I liked driving my "worse" 4Runner a lot more. I'll keep following the experiences and thoughts of others here as I try to make my own decision.

BTW....I'm a new member and appreciate what everyone is contributing.
 

TRD_GUY

TRD Pro
Well-known member
First Name
Ken
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
50
Reaction score
28
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
none
Thanks for the post. I am in a similar situation. Had a 2002 4runner for 21 years and loved it despite its shortcomings. I
BTW....I'm a new member and appreciate what everyone is contributing.
This post offers a detailed and introspective take on the authorā€™s car-buying journey, highlighting their comparison of various vehicles while reflecting on past experiences. Below are key analytical points:

1. Emotional Connection & Experience-Based Evaluation

ā€¢ The author has a deep emotional attachment to their 2002 Toyota 4Runner, having driven it for 21 years and appreciating it despite its shortcomings.
ā€¢ Their evaluation of newer vehicles is largely shaped by their past experiences with the 3rd and 5th generation 4Runner.
ā€¢ Despite improvements in power and technology, they feel newer models still retain the essence of the old 4Runner, which is neither an outright negative nor a ā€œwowā€ factor.

2. Comparative Test Drives & Observations

ā€¢ They test drove:
ā€¢ Two Toyota Tacomas (Sport & Hybrid Off-Road)
ā€¢ A 1958 Land Cruiser
ā€¢ The comparison to the 6th-gen 4Runner (which isnā€™t out yet) suggests they are using these experiences to gauge expectations.
ā€¢ The size increase is noticeable, and while performance is better, the differences over time werenā€™t as striking as expected.

3. Lexus GX 550 vs. 4Runner TRD Pro Dilemma

ā€¢ They are torn between:
ā€¢ Lexus GX 550 Overtrail ā€“ More refined, luxury-oriented, but still off-road capable.
ā€¢ Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro ā€“ More rugged, fun, but less refined.
ā€¢ They are struggling to test drive these vehicles due to availability issues.

Main trade-offs:
ā€¢ GX 550 Pros: Comfort, refinement, V6 power.
ā€¢ GX 550 Cons: 16 mpg premium fuel (worse than their old 4Runner).
ā€¢ 4Runner TRD Pro Pros: Fun and capable.
ā€¢ 4Runner TRD Pro Cons: Less luxurious, possibly less practical.

4. Uncertainty & Potential Alternative

ā€¢ Their frustration is leading them to consider keeping the 2018 V6 Highlander (previously owned by their wife).
ā€¢ Despite its practicality, they find themselves more emotionally attached to the older and ā€œworseā€ 4Runner.
ā€¢ This suggests that driving enjoyment and emotional connection matter more than just features and specs.

5. Decision-Making Challenge

ā€¢ The post reflects internal conflict between:
ā€¢ Rational choice (Highlander or GX 550 for comfort, efficiency, and practicality).
ā€¢ Emotional preference (4Runner TRD Pro for fun and nostalgia).
ā€¢ They seem open to community input and plan to follow othersā€™ experiences before finalizing their decision.

6. Community Engagement & First-Time Member Appreciation

ā€¢ They acknowledge the communityā€™s value and express appreciation.
ā€¢ This signals a desire for shared experiences and potentially some reassurance in making their decision.

Conclusion

This post is a mix of practical analysis and emotional decision-making. The author is torn between comfort/luxury (GX 550, Highlander) and fun/adventure (4Runner TRD Pro) while grappling with modern fuel economy concerns. Their dilemma highlights the challenge of choosing between nostalgia and practicality, a common theme in car buying.
 

mars001

SR5
Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 3, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
100
Reaction score
38
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
2003 4Runner SR5 4.7 V8
This post offers a detailed and introspective take on the authorā€™s car-buying journey, highlighting their comparison of various vehicles while reflecting on past experiences. Below are key analytical points:
@TRD_GUY Thank you so much for the excellent summary! I'm in a more or less similar situation with the exception that I haven't testdriven any of those new vehicles. I have a 4th Gen 2003 4R 4.7V8 that I bought new in 2003 that I'm still driving at 190k miles. Thinking of a 2025 4R too.
 
 



Top